HMM Reviewers Section

1. Reviewer committee members

As publication of research articles by HMM Journal is dependent primarily on the research validation and coherence as judged by the Reviewers, the Reviewer committee member’s role is to be constructive and provide feedback to the authors, their criticism and comments being considered vital to HMM publication process.

2. Reviewer registration form

Title:

Name:

Affiliation:

Country:

E-mail:

Areas of expertise:

3. The review process

As manuscript reviewers are considered vital to our publications process, and as a double-blind refereeing process is used, reviewers have to complete their review within a three weeks period. Their experience of publishing provides the basis for preparing an objective review, by evaluating the new submission to the HMM Journal within the context of their existing research, and ensuring this way the quality control mechanism. After the peer-review process of HMM Journal papers, only accepted papers will be published in the HMM Journal. Their written comments (including suggestions to improving the paper, if any) will be sent to the authors. The review form allows the assessment of the importance of the results presented in paper submitted to the HMM Journal.